anthropic logo
Claude Haiku 4.5
vs
Polaris Alpha

Compare performance metrics, pricing, and capabilities of these AI models.

Key Differences
Context Length
Lower
Claude Haiku 4.5: 200K (disadvantage)
Polaris Alpha: 256K (advantage)
Cost Efficiency
Higher Cost
Prompt: $1.00M vs
Completion: $5.00M vs

Capabilities

Claude Haiku 4.5
Modality: text+image->text
Inputs: image, text
Polaris Alpha
Modality: text+image->text
Inputs: text, image
A
Claude Haiku 4.5
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of large...

Context Length200K
Prompt Price$1.00M
ReleasedOctober 15, 2025
Supports:
text+image->text
P
Polaris Alpha
openrouter/polaris-alpha

This is a cloaked model provided to the community to gather feedback. A powerful, general-purpose model that excels across real-world tasks, with stan...

Context Length256K
Prompt Price
ReleasedNovember 6, 2025
Supports:
text+image->text
Detailed Comparison
Feature
anthropic logo
Claude Haiku 4.5
Polaris Alpha
Context Length200K256K
Prompt Price$1.00M
Completion Price$5.00M
Modalitytext+image->texttext+image->text
Release DateOctober 15, 2025November 6, 2025
Analysis & Recommendations

Quick Summary

This comparison reveals key trade-offs between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Polaris Alpha. Polaris Alpha offers a larger context window of 256K compared to Claude Haiku 4.5's 200K, though Claude Haiku 4.5 comes at a higher cost.

Claude Haiku 4.5 Strengths

  • Competitive context size (200K)
  • Premium pricing for high-quality output
  • Multimodal capabilities for image analysis
  • Proven and stable model

Polaris Alpha Strengths

  • Larger context window (256K) for processing longer documents
  • More cost-effective per token
  • Multimodal capabilities for image analysis
  • Latest generation model

When to Use Each Model

Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 when:
  • • You need competitive context capability for complex tasks
  • • Cost efficiency is not the primary concern in your use case
  • • Working with images and text that benefit from thoughtful reasoning
Choose Polaris Alpha when:
  • • You need the larger context window for long-form content
  • • Cost efficiency is important for your budget
  • • Working with images and text that require advanced processing
Explore More Comparisons

Discover other interesting model comparisons